30 Mar the deception of computer modeling
Computer modeling is used in many different disciplines these days. You have heard lately about the use of computer modeling to predict the spread of Covid-19 , or more typically the weather computer models. The problem with models, however, is the end result is only as good as the model itself, and the data that is used to do the calculations. If either is flawed…the results will be flawed, too.
And the climate models are fatally flawed because they are simply incapable of replicating real atmospheric conditions and the variety of geologic, oceanic, and astronomical influences that shift constantly and have profound impacts on the Earth’s climate. In his book “Confessions of a climate scientist: the global warming hypothesis is an unproven hypothesis” Japanese climate modeler, Dr. Mototaka Nakamura accurately points out that:
“Accurate simulation of cloud is simply impossible in climate models since it requires calculations of processes at scales smaller than 1mm.” Instead, the modellers put in their own cloud parameters. Anyone studying real cloud formation and then the treatment in climate models would be “flabbergasted by the perfunctory treatment of clouds in the models.“
If you have ever wondered why computer models can be so far off…and how many people can be steered into believing that this planet is in peril due to CO2 increases…check out this article on Dr. Nakamura, written by Tony Thomas! This will open your eyes to the significant fallibility of the climate computer modeling systems used to make long-term predictions about future climate changes. Here is the link to the full article